| Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? | |
|
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:40 pm | |
| Without killing Seth Rollins' momentum completely, i feel like they should put the title on him for at least a month so the record books can say Sting won a WWE Championship and have it add to his already HOF career. When the rematch comes around you can easily have Rollins win it back and continue on his roll until Wrestlemania. Thoughts? |
|
| |
Rellim TeamMoose
Posts : 1613 Join date : 2013-07-22 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:03 pm | |
| No, I don't like transitional world champions at all. I wouldn't mind them doing this with a mid-card title like Intercontinental or United States championship like they did with Hart. But keep him away from the WWE title. |
|
| |
Myke Main Eventer
Posts : 4547 Join date : 2013-08-18 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:23 pm | |
| Fuck no. What kinda bullshit is that People bitched about Brock Lesnar being a part timer when he had it. It'd be the same thing, except WORSE with Sting because Lesnar looks far more in shape and isn't as old. |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:00 pm | |
| Sting's gonna win it for 5 minutes and Sheamus is gonna cash in MitB |
|
| |
Eeyen TeamMoose
Posts : 14180 Join date : 2013-07-19 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:04 pm | |
| If he wins it'll just be to get Sheamus over as a heel. I am OK with it but Sheamus is never going to be a top guy. He'll be a top guy in WWE's imagination, maybe, but he'll never even get to the ADR level of overness which was not as good as they wanted in the first place. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:32 pm | |
| I wouldn't mind seeing it. And yes I bitched about Brock...but I hate Brock and I like Sting. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 2:18 am | |
| If anything they should give him a US Title reign cuz he was known for having that title as well (and putting on some pretty damn good matches while having it.)
World Heavyweight Title? Maybe. I can see them allowing him to win over Seth Rollins at some PPV, then have some "revenge" by Authority members, beating him down, then Sheamus cashing in for the WHT only, winning it, and having Sting keeping the US title only.
Though I would honestly prefer to have Rollins as champion until Wrestlemania OR until WWE decides to do something half-decent with Sheamus. |
|
| |
Gopher Love Bites
Posts : 9666 Join date : 2013-07-19 Age : 31 Location : Arlington, Texas
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:43 am | |
| |
|
| |
Chilly TeamSexy
Posts : 12099 Join date : 2013-08-10 Age : 36 Location : Shadow Moses Island
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:56 am | |
| I'm a giant Sting mark...but I certainly wouldn't put the title on him for WWE just have him go away with it for months, or even as a transitional thing to get Sheamus as Champion. I imagine they will do it at some point, just to say he held the title, but I don't think it'll be now. There should only ever be one transitional, paper champion, and that is Mick Foley |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:29 am | |
| Do I think Sting should win the WWE World Heavyweight Championship? Yes, why not.
Do I want him to beat someone who's actually made the belt mean something( which the belt hasn't since Daniel Bryan gave it up last year.)? Nope.
|
|
| |
Batman I am Batman
Posts : 19334 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 28 Location : Learning maturity
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:20 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Eeyen TeamMoose
Posts : 14180 Join date : 2013-07-19 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:45 pm | |
| Well I don't think they should, but I'm starting to think they will. |
|
| |
Go ills go Icon
Posts : 16997 Join date : 2013-07-23
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:52 pm | |
| No way. Even worse if they have him lose it right away to Sheamus. I'd prefer they give it to Sting for a month and then have him lose it back to Rollins. Although I also wouldn't be a fan of this, but I'd even rather see Authority turn on Seth Rollins and Sheamus have Sheamus cash in on Seth. (in 2-3 months or after WrestleMania, not at Night of Champions)
However, I'd prefer Seth Rollins to stay heel for a long time. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:54 pm | |
| I thought they might put it on him at some point, then give him a big face vs. face story with Cena leading up to WrestleMania, ending with Cena getting his sixteenth title off Sting. Flair comes to the ring, all three hug and he raises both guys hands then Sting retires because WWE will never, ever book Sting vs. 'Taker. |
|
| |
Eeyen TeamMoose
Posts : 14180 Join date : 2013-07-19 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:01 pm | |
| I really want to believe that Seth Rollins will be the one to turn babyface but part of me believes Triple H will turn babyface and bury Seth. That kind of is his thing. |
|
| |
Batman I am Batman
Posts : 19334 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 28 Location : Learning maturity
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:03 pm | |
| Triple H should totally do that. Have Seth Rollins win every single title in WWE right now, ALL OF THEM, and then turn face, beat him in a few mins, and win every title off him |
|
| |
Chilly TeamSexy
Posts : 12099 Join date : 2013-08-10 Age : 36 Location : Shadow Moses Island
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:58 am | |
| |
|
| |
fuse Middle Carder
Posts : 681 Join date : 2013-08-21 Age : 42 Location : London, England
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:29 am | |
| Sting shouldn't hold a title, especially not a world championship one. I love sting as much as the next guy, but his time on top is done. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:54 pm | |
| Some of you are thinking i meant Sting getting the belt and then disappearing with it for months. He wins at NOC and then loses it either the next night or at Hell in a Cell. |
|
| |
Chilly TeamSexy
Posts : 12099 Join date : 2013-08-10 Age : 36 Location : Shadow Moses Island
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Thu Sep 03, 2015 3:25 pm | |
| If he's going to hold it for 24 hours, don't bother. |
|
| |
Go ills go Icon
Posts : 16997 Join date : 2013-07-23
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Thu Sep 03, 2015 4:27 pm | |
| If it's a 1 or even 2 month reign then sure but I'd still prefer Seth to hold on to the title. If it's a few mins or 24 hours I think that's just pointless & bad booking. And definitely wouldn't want to see him have the title until like Royal Rumble or something. |
|
| |
Headhunter Jobber
Posts : 9 Join date : 2015-09-06
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:13 pm | |
| Love it or hate it, all signs are pointing to Sting beating Rollins for the belt and then have Sheamus cash in and beat Sting @ NOC:
1. The promo between Rollins and Sheamus.
2. Having Rollins lose to the guy who Triple H beat at WM would be the perfect time to make the inevitable breakup with the Authority happen.
3. Sting could salvage losing his debut match with the company and add the WWE WHC to his accolades without actually carrying the belt.
4. The mind games Sting's playing with Rollins. Adds a whole new dynamic we've never seen before with his past feuds.
5. Sting could start a program with Sheamus next (after cashing in his rematch clause), allowing him to put a younger guy over.
6. Rollins already being beat up from his match with Cena would also add reasonable ground for him to lose.
So I can definitely see cause for it.
Last edited by Headhunter on Mon Sep 07, 2015 11:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| |
| |
Headhunter Jobber
Posts : 9 Join date : 2015-09-06
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:56 pm | |
| - TJtheShizz wrote:
- Headhunter wrote:
- 3. Sting could salvage losing his debut match with the company and add the WWE WHC to his accolades without actually carrying the belt. He'd be the first guy in pro wrestling history to hold the TNA, WCW and WWE WHC.
Oh yeah, forgot about Kurt. :lol: Still, it would add to his accolades. He can say he held the title when he finally agreed to come over to WWE. |
|
| |
Chilly TeamSexy
Posts : 12099 Join date : 2013-08-10 Age : 36 Location : Shadow Moses Island
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? Tue Sep 08, 2015 4:12 am | |
| Well, you could argue he'd be the first legitimate guy to do it. Kurt was WCW Champion when WWE bought it out, so it's debatable. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? | |
| |
|
| |
| Should WWE give Sting a short title reign? | |
|