Burdur, CB and I are doing the first ever three-way trade, tbh.

I'm giving Burdur Murray and Pryor Sr. for Cooks and John Stewart.

I'm also giving CB Maclin for Shepard.

CB's giving Burdur Derrick Henry for John Brown, tbh.

CB's been dreaming of this day... and it's finally here. It's fair all-around IMO. I think I'm taking the biggest risk, tbh but it's time to have some balls, iwbh.

How the fuck are you taking the biggest risk? You're turning a high-volatility RB and WR into a high-volatility WR and one of like 5 total lead RBs in the NFL (Who is now going to be running EVEN MORE) and you're getting his hand-cuff

TJ, you want anyone for Blount, tbh?

I can't stand to see that poor man get neglected on your bench.

Eeyen wrote:

How the fuck are you taking the biggest risk? You're turning a high-volatility RB and WR into a high-volatility WR and one of like 5 total lead RBs in the NFL (Who is now going to be running EVEN MORE) and you're getting his hand-cuff

Cooks has Brady throwing to him.

Stewart has actually been EQUAL to Murray so far without even scoring a rushing TD yet. He's actually a high-volume RB... pretty safe bet actually outside of injury potential (which Murray also has).

If I wasn't getting Henry I would've never taken this trade.

Also, Pryor I'm doing this trade ONLY for Murray.

Btw Ian are you saying this trade is UNFAIR or just that I'm not actually taking a big risk?

McClown Town wrote:

Eeyen wrote:

How the fuck are you taking the biggest risk? You're turning a high-volatility RB and WR into a high-volatility WR and one of like 5 total lead RBs in the NFL (Who is now going to be running EVEN MORE) and you're getting his hand-cuff

Cooks has Brady throwing to him.

Stewart has actually been EQUAL to Murray so far without even scoring a rushing TD yet. He's actually a high-volume RB... pretty safe bet actually outside of injury potential (which Murray also has).

If I wasn't getting Henry I would've never taken this trade.

Also, Pryor I'm doing this trade ONLY for Murray.

Cooks so far: 8 points, 3 points, 25 points, 3 points.

I great game, 1 startable game, 2 DUDS. Fucking great

Pryor so far: 6 points, 3 points, 1 point, 13 points.

Aside from Cooks' second touchdown on week 3 it's pretty darn even. . They have the exact same amount of targets.

---

DeMarco has struggled but is hurt and is getting healthier, which is why you're doing the deal. Jonathan Stewart is exactly what I told you he was, a weekly 5-6 point back you don't want to start and are hoping and praying he gets a touchdown if you have to because you know he's almost never hitting 8 points on total yards.

I don't think it's unfair, I just think if you're thinking rationally about where you should take risks, considering the replacement level WR is so high relative to the replacement level RB you're getting the best end of the deal. And considering you're getting both Tennessee backs you're really not taking a significant risk.

Ok I accept that analysis... I just get paranoid with trades.

Who wouldn't after they got finessed by Moose in a trade.

Oh but...

Making excuses for DeMarco's struggles and automatically assuming he'll be better (especially when he's had a few awful seasons before) is dumb when you don't give Cooks any real credit in the same post (he's had a massive 25 point week already to show what he can do). Cooks has Brady throwing to him, may I repeat.

Pryor has next to zero 20+ potential btw so the Cooks-Pryor comparison is just #dumb as well. I'd trust Stewart over Pryor any day unless there's a big change in the offense soon (what I'm hoping for now). But yeah, I think RB is more important for me right now that's why I'm doing the trade.

I go back and forth but for the most part I legitimately think I'm losing the Snoopz part of the trade when I think about it but I'd rather have the (hopeful/probable) elite RB over the similar WR as long as I have Henry too.

[Fwiw I mainly did this trade for the matchups. I like these better.]

And CB needs to hurry up and accept his part of the trade.

I did this trade just because I wanted to do a three team trade.

Hey TJ, did you get my offer?

I, too, sent TJ an offer.

Yo Teej, I ain't trying to rush you are anything, but I need a WR. Are you accepting the deal or nah?

He told me if he accepts my trade, it won't be until after Sunday, because he has too many people on bye this week so he needs the player I'm going after.

The player I'm going after has a bye this week.

Ah. Maybe he just doesn't want your trade, then.

He could just reject it then.

I was giving myself time to think about them both tbh.

So the issue is, if I make these two trades

I give away
Willie Snead
LeGarrete Blount

I get
Demariyus Thomas
Alex Collins

And I think I like the two I have better. :/

Thoughts from the peanut gallery?

You don't need to make both of the trades, tbh.

It's Demaryius for Blount from my end, so this so-called peanut gallery knows. I just want my buddy Blount.

Trading Blount means I only have 2 RBs but have an excess at WR

Trading Snead means I'm crippled at WR but now have 4 RBs

I'm not doing one or the other. It's both or nothing

Points are made that are good.

The issue from my perspective is that I would like to know if you're going to do it, so that if you don't, I'll just turn elsewhere. And if you want to wait until the end of the week, that's fine. But just know that by the end of the week there's a chance the offer is no longer on the table depending on how my rostered RBs turn out. If Alex Collins ends up being the clear best out of the bunch I have for the FLEX position, I might just hold onto him.

Mexi wants this trade done NOW. He knows Alex Collins will lose all his value by next week.

This nigga Burdue acting like he didn't want to trade for him.

Thing is I didn't want any of those garbage boom or bust niggas he had at WR. I have enough of those already on my team.