Either before or at the PPV? To make it Seth Rollins vs Roman Reigns at WM (maybe even add Dean Ambrose in)?

Or do they go with Brock Lesnar vs Roman Reigns even despite the reaction Reigns got after winning?

Personally, wouldn't be a fan of that, especially adding Ambrose in unless it makes complete sense.

They go with Brock vs Reigns and should.

WWE will probably try something desperate to win fans back. They did last year.

Either Cena or Lesnar (their two money makers) are going into WM w/ the belt, & that is the bottom line.

It's more likely that Rollins cashes it in either during or after WM. Plus, I think WWE wants Reigns working w/ a big name to help him get some momentum for the future.

But I really don't know how WWE salvages the Mania main event. Think they're just fucked. WWE inadvertently buried Roman Reigns by having him win the Royal Rumble, they knew people were going to shit on Reigns. I don't know if he'll ever recover from this, so meh at the whole idea.

Rollins cashes in after Reigns beats Lesnar. That's the only way to save Wrestlemania. But knowing WWE theyd have Reigns pin both Lesnar AND Rollins.

A surprise on the show won't help the buy rate though.

Itll save the crowd reactions. You dont need 70,000 people shitting on a babyface after a big win.

WrestleMania is going to be one the west coast though. I don't think you'll have the crazy amount of smarks until the RAW after.

If Dead is right and the crowd boos Reigns, then why should Seth Rollins cash in on Reigns at WM? He'll get cheers when he really shouldn't for his cash-in.

I think Seth Rollins should cash in before or after WM. Not during WM, especially not if Reigns does win the title. It makes more sense for him to cash in if Reigns loses BUT then Reigns looks like shit all-around if that were the case. It also looks pretty bad on Reigns if he wins the title and then loses it to the MITB cash-in, for that matter.

Seth will probably cash in after WM, and that's how it should be IMO.

Or we can forget the surprise title match nonsense and have Rollins announce he's making the WrestleMania title match a three way.

True

But it doesn't seem like something Rollins would be willing to do.

EDIT: Actually, I could see it. Just not wanting Reigns to win it bad enough... wanting to win it before Reigns that badly.

Man, heels play dirty when they cash it in. Nigga as to run up on someone

Have someone challenge Reigns for his title shot at Fast Lane. Maybe...idk...the person the fans want to win the belt? Daniel Bryan, mayhaps?

Agreed, but Seth is the kind of guy who wants the spotlight badly. Add in the fact it's Reigns getting the title shot and it adds in extra incentive.

Maybe he could say he wants to cash in vs Brock in a singles match at WM... just to take away Reigns title shot that way. Then have it end up being a triple threat match through some kind of storyline twist where Reigns gets his spot in the match back.

It would make more sense to just add Seth in through the Authority again, though and not even involve the MITB.

TJ.... that would never happen.

BurdurSmurf wrote:

If Dead is right and the crowd boos Reigns, then why should Seth Rollins cash in on Reigns at WM? He'll get cheers when he really shouldn't for his cash-in.

I think Seth Rollins should cash in before or after WM. Not during WM, especially not if Reigns does win the title. It makes more sense for him to cash in if Reigns loses BUT then Reigns looks like shit all-around if that were the case. It also looks pretty bad on Reigns if he wins the title and then loses it to the MITB cash-in, for that matter.

Seth will probably cash in after WM, and that's how it should be IMO.

He's going to get booed regardless, the boos started trickling in during several Raws where he was facing Big Show and Rollins. Everyone has seen that he cant talk, he can hardly wrestle and it's blatently obvious he was carried throughout the lifespan of the Shield. But for some strange reason, everyone has to accept the fact that WWE wants this guy to take the ball from John Cena and run with it, when he's not ready. That's why hes going to get booed at Mania, and that's why Rollins needs to cash in to send that crowd home happy.

MooseNugget wrote:

Or we can forget the surprise title match nonsense and have Rollins announce he's making the WrestleMania title match a three way.

There's never been a MITB cash-in attempt at Mania since the concept was introduced. The closest we got was the postRaw with Ziggler.

Dead wrote:

MooseNugget wrote:

Or we can forget the surprise title match nonsense and have Rollins announce he's making the WrestleMania title match a three way.

There's never been a MITB cash-in attempt at Mania since the concept was introduced. The closest we got was the postRaw with Ziggler.

There's a first time for everything my friend

People have been challenged for (and lost) their royal rumble...winner...ness before. St. Valentine's Day Massacre ring a bell?

Roman Reigns has already been fucked over enough already...there's no turning back now, they are invested

Yeah it's happened before. Orton almost took Misterio's title match away.

BurdurSmurf wrote:

Maybe he could say he wants to cash in vs Brock in a singles match at WM... just to take away Reigns title shot that way. Then have it end up being a triple threat match through some kind of storyline twist where Reigns gets his spot in the match back.

The more I think about this right now, the more I like it.

It's the only MITB scenario for WM I actually like. (would add to the match build up and the actual match at WM, so it gets people to both tune in and like what they're watching, even if Reigns ends up victorious)

Even if Rollins loses his MITB that way, he can make it in the main event without it. I think he's clearly shown that. The Authority alone can give him another shot soon down the line with ease.

Brock is gonna turn babyface and Reigns will turn heel and everything will be perfect

YJ wrote:

People have been challenged for (and lost) their royal rumble...winner...ness before. St. Valentine's Day Massacre ring a bell?

I'm saying DB vs Reigns makes no sense... cause it doesn't for numerous reasons.

The main 3: It's face vs face for something face 1 fairly earned. Why is DB getting the opportunity over anyone else and who decides this? Why would they destroy Reigns like that?

Fuck it. Just cancel WrestleMania this year. Give people a WrestleMania break. Then people will start to miss it