Hacksaw?

Del Rio

I'd argue Alberto, for losing his Wrestlemania match, which was just shoved in the midcard somewhere.

That & the fact that he was only on the main roster for like 4 months & won it

Del Rio's Mania match after that was actually first.

But anyway, some of the worst?

Both of John Cena's (both were predictable as fuck)
Rey Mysterio
Batista's 2nd win
Vince McMahon

How was Cena's first Rumble win predictable as fuck? He wasn't even supposed to return for a few more months. I remember everyone being very surprised to see him in the Rumble that year. Although, his second Rumble win was definitely predictable.

I say Sheamus tbh. I like him, but I know everyone wanted Jericho to win, and the resulting Mania match was one of the biggest letdowns of all time.

Batista last year, because the moment he won, the fans turned on him...and also Sheamus and Del Rio just for being meh when they happened.

As soon as Cena entered the match, you knew he was going to win. It was one of those "comeback" stories that usually result in a Rumble win. Almost everyone returning at the PPV from some kind of injury has won. Austin, HHH, Edge. Not to mention Orton was the Champion at the time, and he was in the middle of a feud with him right before he left.

Vince McMahon's. Never watched it myself but I read about the match on WrestleCrap.

^
I wouldn't say that's the worst by any means. It was part of a wider storyline about screwing over Austin.

If anything, it was awesome.

Yeah because having nothing go on in the ring is really compelling stuff.

How was there nothing going on in the ring? The match has 30 people in it.

From what I read there were points in the match there was only one person in the ring. So they would have to stand there and wait for someone. A lot of the action was happening in the back.

Meh. Either way, WWE is like 70% entertainment, 30% wrestling. If the storyline was good (Which Vince vs Austin was), it can make up for the matches being meh.

^
That. Splitting the attention of the audience constantly wouldn't have been good.

MooseNugget wrote:

From what I read there were points in the match there was only one person in the ring. So they would have to stand there and wait for someone. A lot of the action was happening in the back.

I've watched the match twice, and that only happened once, and it was Al Snow so it was great.

YJ wrote:

MooseNugget wrote:

From what I read there were points in the match there was only one person in the ring. So they would have to stand there and wait for someone. A lot of the action was happening in the back.

I've watched the match twice, and that only happened once, and it was Al Snow so it was great.

I'm more inclined to believe WrestleCrap over you

He said Al Snow was great so I'm believing TJ.
I sometimes feel like the only Al Snow fan in the world.

Meth is Al Snow Matches Rule. Confirmed.

Meth has the many volumes of "The Best of Al Snow". Mick Foley confirms its existence.

Batman wrote:

Meth is Al Snow Matches Rule. Confirmed.

wot?

Chilly wrote:

Meth has the many volumes of "The Best of Al Snow". Mick Foley confirms its existence.

I do. There's no matches, just instances where he's fucking mental and screaming at Head.

Sheamus. I do like Sheamus too, but it was kind of a let down that Jericho didn't win. At least Orton didn't win that Royal Rumble just because it was his hometown.

Batista's second one. The idea of him facing Orton at WM was kinda meh. And like people said on the other page, fans turned on him. Though I loved his heel run.

Del Rio. He was being pushed down our throats like they did with Sheamus, and he won the Royal Rumble after being in WWE a few months? Damn. I wish WWE got to develop Del Rio more cause I liked it when he beat Big Show in a last man standing match. That was unexpected. He started to become stale as a face after the Swagger feud though.

Al Snow Matchs Rule is a lot like Meth tbh