| Who Has had a Better Career? #1 | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:01 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:06 pm | |
| |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:27 pm | |
| I'd say Show, cause he's the only one to have held all 3 of the Big Three world titles. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:45 pm | |
| Kane held all 3 as well. WWE in 1998, ECW in 2008 (if you really want to count that), and the World Heavyweight Championship in 2010 as well. |
|
| |
Saintpat Main Eventer
Posts : 1582 Join date : 2013-10-10 Location : Jobberville
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:00 pm | |
| Close but I'll go with Kane ... he's been a "bigger" threat at times in major feuds, particularly with Undertaker |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:01 pm | |
| Ehh, the WHC isn't really the same as the WCW title, honestly. |
|
| |
Batman I am Batman
Posts : 19334 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 28 Location : Learning maturity
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:02 pm | |
| Big Show has held more titles than most people. Kane has held a lot, but not the same. I prefer Kane, but Big Show has had a better career. ____________________ . Favorite Current Wrestlers:1. Sasha Banks 2. Becky Lynch 3. 4. 5. Favorite All-Time Wrestlers:Your dad |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:08 pm | |
| Kane's had more Tag Team title reigns than Show (12 vs 11), although Big Show is a 7 time world-champion, whilst Kane is a 3-time. Kane's had "Worst Feud of the Year" almost every year lol (2002 to 2004, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2012!), compared to Show only having two in his entire career So, yeah I'd say Show, though Kane has the record for most career wins in WWE history |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:37 pm | |
| - TJ wrote:
- Ehh, the WHC isn't really the same as the WCW title, honestly.
Its the same title....lol |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:39 pm | |
| Big Show has held the major belt of the three biggest companies ever. WWE, WCW, ECW (tho It was a brand, but WWE lives in a little world) |
|
| |
MooseNugget TeamMoose
Posts : 23406 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 32 Location : Kotzebue, AK
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:52 pm | |
| I'd say Big Show. He was made to do less goofy stuff than Kane. ____________________ |
|
| |
FinestJellyBeansRaw Show Opener
Posts : 352 Join date : 2014-06-15
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:14 am | |
| In what world is ECW one of the three biggest companies ever? Just off the top of my head CMLL, AAA, AJPW, NJPW, AJW, FMW, TNA and ROH have all been or are bigger than ECW was. |
|
| |
Minkaro Learn Maturity
Posts : 6125 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 34 Location : Shrewsbury, Shropshire
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:35 am | |
| - #OriolesMagic wrote:
- TJ wrote:
- Ehh, the WHC isn't really the same as the WCW title, honestly.
Its the same title....lol No, it's the same prop. WWE officially recognise Triple H as the first World Heavyweight Champion, which I think is pretty clear evidence that they consider it a separate thing from the WCW title. |
|
| |
MorphyVA Motherfucking SETONIAN!
Posts : 2166 Join date : 2014-01-30 Age : 25 Location : Philippines
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:34 am | |
| ^^ I believe ECW was well known, but not one of the biggest companies. |
|
| |
MooseNugget TeamMoose
Posts : 23406 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 32 Location : Kotzebue, AK
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:32 am | |
| Well ECW was on national TV network. ROH is widely syndicated but it doesn't cover the entire US yet.
Also ECW was able to run a lot more shows and dates. Though this is probably because ECW screwed a lot of their talent on their pay. ____________________ |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:19 pm | |
| - Mink wrote:
- #OriolesMagic wrote:
- TJ wrote:
- Ehh, the WHC isn't really the same as the WCW title, honestly.
Its the same title....lol No, it's the same prop. WWE officially recognise Triple H as the first World Heavyweight Champion, which I think is pretty clear evidence that they consider it a separate thing from the WCW title. I'm pretty sure they made a new belt for the WHC too. It always looked more sturdy than the original, the WCW title always looked really thin and flimsy. The WWE version was a lot thicker. |
|
| |
FinestJellyBeansRaw Show Opener
Posts : 352 Join date : 2014-06-15
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:54 pm | |
| Even if they were bigger than ROH, there's no way in hell they were the third biggest company in the world at any point. |
|
| |
TJ Ω #TeamRomie
Posts : 5285 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 29 Location : Where I Shouldn't Be
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:40 pm | |
| We've had this argument before. They were the third biggest company in America, and that matters more than internationally. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Sun Sep 28, 2014 3:50 pm | |
| During the 90's it was WWF, WCW, ECW has the big 3. Even tho ECW was way smaller then WWF and WCW it was still a largely known company |
|
| |
MooseNugget TeamMoose
Posts : 23406 Join date : 2013-07-23 Age : 32 Location : Kotzebue, AK
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:15 am | |
| - FinestJellyBeansRaw wrote:
- Even if they were bigger than ROH, there's no way in hell they were the third biggest company in the world at any point.
Oh I know And TJ not wanting to recognize pro wrestling out of The States ____________________ |
|
| |
FinestJellyBeansRaw Show Opener
Posts : 352 Join date : 2014-06-15
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:09 am | |
| - TJ wrote:
- They were the third biggest company in America, and that matters more than internationally.
This makes less than no sense. It makes negative sense. CMLL sell out a 16K seater multiple times a weeks for decades, but it means nothing because they're not in America? NJPW has multiple 60K+ attendance events in the same year but that doesn't matter? Come on son. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:08 am | |
| ^NJPW only became a thing when Vader's eye popped out of the eye socket in a live match. Until then, America was the only country in the world my friend. #sarcasm |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:54 pm | |
| Statistically Big Show had the better career. But personally I preferred more of Kane's higher impact story-lines. |
|
| |
WrestleFanatic Sam Nash Jobber
Posts : 189 Join date : 2014-02-08 Age : 29 Location : Georgia
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:05 pm | |
| Lets be honest, both of these guys have just temporary filled main event slots for various reasons their entire WWE careers. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:53 pm | |
| I'd argue that Big Show is right behind Kane as far as big men go. Kane is right behind the Undertaker. Kane's just been so good for such a long time. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Who Has had a Better Career? #1 | |
| |
|
| |
| Who Has had a Better Career? #1 | |
|