Guest
Guest
 |  Subject: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sat Aug 27, 2016 4:16 pm | |
| Since they are all independent contractors and not employees  |
|
Dragon Fx
KingofSwing
Posts : 9018
Join date : 2013-07-23
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:05 pm | |
| The independent contractor status gives WWE much more freedom to make it's own rules / policies for it's own benefit due to the wrestlers not actually being employees. |
|
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:09 pm | |
| i still wonder how the hey they can get away with that |
|
Dragon Fx
KingofSwing
Posts : 9018
Join date : 2013-07-23
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:46 pm | |
| Yeah, the whole independent contract thing in the way WWE does it doesn't seem like it would be legal. |
|
Eeyen
TeamMoose
Posts : 14180
Join date : 2013-07-19
Age : 31
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sat Aug 27, 2016 6:57 pm | |
| Because no one benefits from fighting it. |
|
MooseNugget
TeamMoose
Posts : 23406
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 32
Location : Kotzebue, AK
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy Sun Aug 28, 2016 11:57 am | |
| There's no reason someone shouldn't be able to wrestle for TNA is they fail a WWE drug test. I'm pretty sure TNA's wellness policy is that they won't pay you enough to buy drugs. ____________________  |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Shouldn't technically no one in WWE be affected by the wellness policy | |
| |
|
