Sony Pictures are determined to produce more films that appeal to girls and have, therefore, decided to make a Spider-Woman movie in 2017.

A source at the film company told the Sunday Mirror newspaper: ''For years it has been all about male superheroes but it's about time that changed.

''There should be more movies made with girls in mind, this was something that [former Sony Pictures chief Amy Pascal] was very adamant about.''

This comes shortly after Kevin Feige, the president of Marvel Studios, revealed that the studio's 'Spider-Man' movie will not be an origin story.

In February, the two studios announced that Spider-Man will first appear in a Marvel film, before the comic book hero appears in the next installment of Sony's own franchise.

Kevin explained the Marvel film will work on the assumption that its audience already knows the ''specifics'' of Peter Parker's life.

He said: ''In Spider-Man's very specific case, where there have been two retellings of that origin in the last whatever it's been - [13] years - for us, we are going to take it for granted that people know that, and the specifics.

''It will not be an origin story, but with great power comes great responsibility. It is inherent to who his character is. But we want to reveal it in different ways and spend much more time focusing on this young high school kid in the Marvel Comic universe dealing with his powers.''

That sounds like Spider-Woman will be "as well as" rather than "instead of."

Bruh.

Let's just keep over saturating the superhero film genre even more. All it takes is one more dud to realize that too much isn't always a good thing.

Yeah because 20 superhero films in the past few years is totally oversaturating it, but 10000000000 horror films this past month isn't, right? FoH with that retarded 'oversaturating' argument you Kim Kardashian teen girl fans love to use.

The only horror movie that's come out in the past 2 weeks is Unfriended, so...what? LOL.

"The past 2 weeks"

You know how many superhero movies have come out the past 2 weeks? None.

People that say that there can be "too many superhero movies" are stupid. Or people who say there can be too many "comic book movies." (since not all comic book heroes are SUPER heroes, IE: Green Arrow, Watchmen, Kingsmen, Mad Max and of course, Batman.)

Batman wrote:

You know how many superhero movies have come out the past 2 weeks? None.

Age of Ultron was released already in the UK and such.

Just saying.

Batman wrote:

"The past 2 weeks"

You know how many superhero movies have come out the past 2 weeks? None.

People that say that there can be "too many superhero movies" are stupid. Or people who say there can be too many "comic book movies." (since not all comic book heroes are SUPER heroes, IE: Green Arrow, Watchmen, Kingsmen, Mad Max and of course, Batman.)

A "superhero" doesnt need some sort of power to be considered one. 

Also they arent stupid, because you can say the same thing about video games. You know, there was only a "crash" back in the 80s that almost killed the video game industry because the market was flooded with everything you can imagine.

I don't know why they're basing Spider Woman's background on Peter Parker's when she has her own.