- As previously reported, WWE denied that Brock Lesnar performed a blade job in his main event match against Roman Reigns at WrestleMania 31. The Wrestling Observer has some more details on the incident.

According to the report, WWE sources claim that Vince McMahon did not sign off on the blade job by Lesnar. Before this most recent occurrence, the last person to perform a blade job was Batista, and he received a fine of $100,000 as a result. The report suggests something like Lesnar blading would need approval by McMahon, and other officials are claiming this is not the case and no blade job even occurred.

Credit: The Wrestling Observer via Rajah.com

I don't get why anyone still thinks this was a blading job. He hit the pole and immediately started bleeding, with his hands not being near his forehead where the bleeding started.

He could've done it immediately when he went down (which I remember thinking he did cause he put his hand right to his head really quick).

He was already bleeding before he hit the floor, from what I remember. And why would he blade on the top of his head anyway, and not his forehead as per usual?

The camera sucks because it's like majorly zoomed in. But, it's around 24:28. He gets pushed into the ring post. I see no indication of his hands moving quickly enough to blade himself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVJj2IWll0I

He just simply hit the post harder that he expected too. The reaction afterwards was legit, I think, from getting knocked out a little.

Why are people still freaking out over "if Lesnar bladed or not"?
Who cares? The match was awesome, the outcome was spectacular.

Because you're not allowed to do it in WWE any more.

If he had bladed, surely the cuts wouldn't have been as visible as the ones on his cheek (or the top of his head) he had on Raw the following night.