Vince McMahon disapproves.

By count out

The Marvelous Myke Hunt wrote:

Lesnar beating Reigns clean.
Rollins cashes in.
Lesnar beats him too.

This is seriously exactly what I want. Keep building Lesnar as an unstoppable force.

If WWE's keeping Brock after WM, that needs to happen.

Maybe have Brock finally lose the title at SS to Daniel Bryan. Or even keep it until next year's WM. (I know a lot of people would really not like that tho )

Rollins is set as a future main eventer regardless of if he wins his first World title with MITB or not.

Your ideas are retarded.

That's Myke's idea

Also, it very likely won't actually happen, but I'd love every second of the end of WM if all that happened.

Whoever's idea it is, it's stupid. Fuck Lesnar.

I want Brock Lesner to squash Reigns. Beat John Cena the next night. Leave WWE. Then lose to Frank Mir in a MMA fight

yeah lets continue has a the major title remain a non factor

I don't think the title's a non-factor tbh. Heyman keeps it relevant while Lesnar gives it a whole lot of credibility.

But I do think WWE have too many main event guys / potential main eventers right now to want to keep the title on Lesnar.

heyman pop up only a few time before royal rumble to remind us brock is champion. The champion doesn't have to be on every show and ppv but he shouldn't be off tv for months at a time.

How do I want Wrestlemania to end?

Quickly.

What I think will happen is just Vince McMahon's vision from the beginning: Brock Lesnar beats Undertaker at WrestleMania 30, building him as this Unstoppable Beast who wins the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. Roman Reigns wins the Royal Rumble, goes on to WrestleMania to finally put an end to the Beast and look strong, building a new top star in the process. I'm sure this was his vision since 1 year ago, and because of his stubborn personality, he's not gonna change his plans because in his mind, that would mean losing and Vince McMahon never loses. He would rather feed his own ego than to give his paying fans what they want! Fucking asshole... Anyways, Roman Reigns is probably gonna win after 2 spears, 3 spears is too much, it wouldn't make Reigns look like a Hogan/Rock/Austin/Undertaker/Cena type superstar which is what Vince is trying to do. And keep the title for a month at least.

How do I want WrestleMania to end? Without Roman Reigns or Brock Lesnar. I want to see Undertaker win his last match or Sting beat Triple H in the main event.

Your "I hate WWE and Vince" rants are getting boring <_<

Luigi D'Alessandro wrote:

What I think will happen is just Vince McMahon's vision from the beginning: Brock Lesnar beats Undertaker at WrestleMania 30, building him as this Unstoppable Beast who wins the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. Roman Reigns wins the Royal Rumble, goes on to WrestleMania to finally put an end to the Beast and look strong, building a new top star in the process. I'm sure this was his vision since 1 year ago, and because of his stubborn personality, he's not gonna change his plans because in his mind, that would mean losing and Vince McMahon never loses. He would rather feed his own ego than to give his paying fans what they want! Fucking asshole... Anyways, Roman Reigns is probably gonna win after 2 spears, 3 spears is too much, it wouldn't make Reigns look like a Hogan/Rock/Austin/Undertaker/Cena type superstar which is what Vince is trying to do. And keep the title for a month at least.

How do I want WrestleMania to end? Without Roman Reigns or Brock Lesnar. I want to see Undertaker win his last match or Sting beat Triple H in the main event.

Dolph Ziggler winning something. R-Truth losing. Everything else is bah.

I actually agree with Caine. I want it to end with the ladder match.

Chilly wrote:

Your "I hate WWE and Vince" rants are getting boring <_<

Your ''dissing'' comments are getting boring.

That was the only one

Chilly wrote:

That was the only one

Ever!? That's a pretty bold statement. It might have been the only one this year, but you know damn well you were like this years ago. I can see you haven't changed.

I'd take one Chilly insult post over thirty "BOOHOO VINCE HATES ME ROMAN REIGNS SUCKS, WHY ISN'T AMBROSE CHAMPION OF EVERYTHING" posts <_<.

Mink wrote:

I'd take one Chilly insult post over thirty "BOOHOO VINCE HATES ME ROMAN REIGNS SUCKS, WHY ISN'T AMBROSE CHAMPION OF EVERYTHING" posts <_<.

At least I'm right.

No you're not. You have an opinion, and you choose to shove that opinion as a fact. Big difference.

Luigi D'Alessandro wrote:

Chilly wrote:

That was the only one

Ever!? That's a pretty bold statement. It might have been the only one this year, but you know damn well you were like this years ago. I can see you haven't changed.

The fuck you on about? Who said "ever"?  I ain't spoken to you in years. Like, literally years...if people didn't like you in SIW, it's because you were a moron who didn't understand the social aspect of having a conversation, but what that has to do with this I have no clue.

No one made that relevant but you, yourself, in that post...so congratulations.

I made an observation, which others probably agree with (eg. Mink in the above post) that all you do is rant about the same shit in many threads, which barely makes sense anyway. Everyone can give their opinions, hence why are here, but reading THE SAME FUCKING THING MANY TIMES IN EVERY THREAD YOU POST IN IS BORING. If you can't take criticism of your constant criticism, then that's your fault for being narrow minded.

If I wanted to be an ass to you, I would have replied with "HEY GUYS!" after each one...but I didn't.

So get your facts straight, you tool.

Ian should be WWE Head Booker tbh