Daniel vs. Roman at Fast Lane
Daniel beats Roman clean.
Daniel goes for a handshake out of respect.
Roman snaps and assaults Daniel.
[Insert Boos Here]
Lesnar vs. Daniel at WrestleMania.
It doesn't matter if the match actually finishes or not: Roman comes out, cleans house, Rollins cashes in, boom.

Sounds like something Bull would book. That's not a bad thing though.

I'd have it differently but almost same form.

•Reigns Beats Bryan. Bryan goes to shake his hand after the match but Reigns superman punches him instead.

•Reigns then gets a manager, a new look & theme.

•Brock beats Reigns. Reigns gets pissed off and beats the crap out of Lesner.

•Rollins cashes in.

Yours would most likely happen, mine is just another one of my big imagination ideas.

Why are you making Lesnar look incredibly weak in every scenario? lol

A nice way of having Reigns turning Heel would be having him lose to Brock Lesnar on WM after a very "physical match". Rollins appears and stares at Reigns, grinning, then Reigns turns around, spears him, Rollins cashes in for the win. Rollins gets the title and shakes hands with Reigns, making it clear that Roman is his new "Enforcer" (hired goon).

^This, of course, if the WWE thinks of having Lesnar dropping the title at WM.

well Brock is leaving to go back to the UFC. So why care about making him look strong?

Dead if you meant me, I'm not making him look weak. Its why I didn't go into detail as to what happens in the match. Just that something happens that causes Rollins to cash in and win.

No i meant Broski. In his one scenario he had Lesnar get destroyed by Reigns but it took one superkick and the Accolade from Rusev for Reigns to lose to Rollins. In the other one he mentioned, he has Reigns go batshit insane and assault Lesnar only to lose to Rollins?

Billion Dollar Bull wrote:

well Brock is leaving to go back to the UFC. So why care about making him look strong?

He is? Was never confirmed and we wont know what his intentions are until Wrestlemania time.

The news reports of Lesnar going back to the UFC literally keep contradicting one another. So at this rate, you shouldn't believe he's going to UFC.

I think he is leaving. Going to UFC or not I don't care, but I think WM 31 is going to be the last time we see Brock as a wwe superstar. If he is leaving, why protect him?

Staying with WWE would be the easy thing to do for Brock. He wouldn't have to train more than he does now.

Dead wrote:

No i meant Broski. In his one scenario he had Lesnar get destroyed by Reigns but it took one superkick and the Accolade from Rusev for Reigns to lose to Rollins. In the other one he mentioned, he has Reigns go batshit insane and assault Lesnar only to lose to Rollins?

What would it matter? Lesnar ain't winning and he ain't staying. This match is all about putting the future of the WWE into the spot light. Lesnar is gonna be putting someone over whether he's strong or weak.

I'm just picturing how hilarious it would look for Daniel Bryan to offer Roman a handshake and Roman does a Superman Punch.

Most people who get a hand shake offer, only to attack the person, don't leap into the air and deck them with a flying punch.

Tbh: the only way WWE would keep Brock Lesnar a bit longer would be if they wanted his reign to be longer than CM Punk's. (Which would be the case come Summer Slam).

Zanon wrote:

Tbh: the only way WWE would keep Brock Lesnar a bit longer would be if they wanted his reign to be longer than CM Punk's. (Which would be the case come Summer Slam).

Actually Lesnar would have to keep it past Summerslam, but thats not going to happen.

^ Punk's reign was more than 440 days. Lesnar would only have it for a year come Summerslam.

That was meant for Zanon.

^ohhh yeah. Right.
(I saw the Combined Title Reigns duration instead of the actual time.)
Well then, Brock is a goner then.

If Brock were staying or going he wasnt keeping the belt past Mania.