The question is "do enough people still like Sasha to have a problem with this?"

WWE's booking is trash.

Well, before it was Alexa, it was just Charlotte & Sasha passing the belt around between each other.

Banks is probably gonna win the belt back in like 3 weeks anyways

10-day title reigns are trash.

Alexa has beaten 3 of the 4 Horsewomen clean multiple times. Either they're committing HARD to feeding her to Charlotte or they're feeding Charlotte to her too.

Alexa's probably the best mic worker out of all the women in WWE and is great in the ring. Also, she's not a face despite being an ultra dick.

There's more to being Roman Reigns than getting a lot of title reigns/winning a lot of matches clean, tbh. And as Drachen said, Charlotte and Sasha had the title a shitton of times. I'd say Charlotte was made to look stronger during her reigns than Alexa.

I don't mind short title reigns if they happen infrequently. That shit with Sasha/Charlotte before was horrible and I don't get why they gave Sasha the belt just to have her lose it back to Alexa again. That doesn't make anyone in this scenario Roman, tbh.

If anyone's Roman, it's Bayley, because WWE ruined the fuck out of her.

Giggity Gopher wrote:

I'd say Charlotte was made to look stronger during her reigns than Alexa.

I would hope so. Charlotte's 6 foot tall and shredded. Alexa looks like a generic college girl. <_<

Alexa is Roman in that they're both good wrestlers, but the booking of them is absolutely atrocious in that they're seemingly unbeatable while the subtext of their character says otherwise. Roman was supposed to be an underdog, but that didn't work cause he always won clean. Alexa is supposed to be a chickenshit heel, but that doesn't work because she always wins clean.

People are saying they're trying to turn Alexa face with this Nia thing. If that's the case than at least the invincible booking makes a little bit of sense. She still didn't have to bury three of the four horsewomen by, and I quote from reddit:

Quote :

Alexa calls Becky Lynch a joke of a champion: She beats her and proves she's a joke of a champion.

Alexa says Bayley isn't hardcore enough to use a kendo stick: She squashes her and proves Bayley isn't hardcore enough to use a kendo stick.

Alexa says Sasha is choke artist and she can't defend her title: She beats her a proves she can't defend her title.

I like Alexa, I think she's a great heel, I think she's very attractive, and she's improved a lot in the ring. However, in no universe does she deserve to be a 4-time champion and get fed three of the best female wrestlers in the world over the course of a year.

Fun fact: Sasha has never successfully defended that title all 4 times she has had it.

I never thought of Alexa as a chickenshit heel. Not every heel who's small needs to be a chickenshit. I see her more as the arrogant, athletic heel who can back up what they say.

Also, you really need to stop saying people get buried when they lose cleanly. The only one I'd say did get buried by her was Bayley. Becky losing the title cleanly doesn't make her a joke of a champion and Sasha being a choke artist could easily lead to a story about her overcoming that and finally proving she can keep a title. You know, build up to a big payoff. Both Becky and Sasha still looked good in their matches, which isn't what burying does.

People don't get buried when they lose cleanly.

They get buried when they lose cleanly multiple times and (when they're a face) never get their comeuppance.

I don't agree with that. I don't think wrestling needs to be as black and white as people say it does, with heels and faces. I don't think every/most heels need to cheat to win matches or that faces can't cleanly lose entire feuds. I think it's boring as fuck if that's how every feud works.

You're right, wrestling doesn't need to be like that. You know how much I love NJPW, and it doesn't have clear faces and heels. But that's how WWE presents itself: there are clear good guys and clear bad guys. And yeah, heels can win cleanly, faces can lose feuds, it's a good way to build a heel. However, when that happens, the face looks bad. They "lose momentum", the fans "don't believe in them as much", however you want to frame it, they are on a lower level, in kayfabe, than they were before. That's what I mean by "buried", even if it's a small burial, it's still a burial. And I don't like that Becky, Sasha, and Bayley were buried like that, made to look like Alexa is so much better than them, because I think all three of them are way better than her.

Fair enough. Although, I'd 100% say Alexa is better than Bayley (I'd probably put her above Sasha and Becky as well, but I think they're three of the best in WWE at the moment).

I think it's definitely agreeable that the booking of RAW's Women's Championship isn't good and that stretches back to the hot potato game between Sasha and Charlotte. Tossing the title around in quick reigns does nobody any favors.

Giggity Gopher wrote:

I think it's definitely agreeable that the booking of RAW's Women's Championship isn't good and that stretches back to the hot potato game between Sasha and Charlotte. Tossing the title around in quick reigns does nobody any favors.

Definitely. They need to stop that.

or maybe Sasha is the female Mikey Whipwreck. It could just a long the lines this is just apart of her character right now for whatever reason. Like Alexa said she is both a winner and a loser at the same time. I don't think it's the fact they are high on Bliss, it is just a thing they are doing with Sasha. idk if they don't trust her or they just wanna fuck with her.

Someone who's nickname is The Boss shouldn't be like Mikey Whipwreck.

WWE with the divas division.