– Following the angle at the Royal Rumble, the thought was that WWE was setting up Bray Wyatt vs. Brock Lesnar for WrestleMania 32 and that the angle would continue at Fastlane. On this morning’s edition of Wrestling Observer Radio, it was revealed that plans changed in regards to Bray Wyatt, which is why there was no Wyatt Family involvement in the Fastlane main event. At this time, WWE is now planning for Brock Lesnar vs. Dean Ambrose at WrestleMania 32.

Eh, that should be good. Make it a Street Fight or something.

That should have been the main event of last year's WrestleMania with Reigns in the Intercontinental Championship Ladder Match instead. I think it's too late to do Ambrose vs. Lesnar, I'd prefer Wyatt vs. Lesnar TBH. But I'm still excited for this.

Brock vs Dean is money. Honestly, Roman is getting the accolades, but Dean got the better match. Seems right.

Brock vs Dean will overshadow Roman/HHH. They really should make it a no DQ match though, or any good stip.

Yup, it's officially Brock vs Ambrose. And they did just make it a Street Fight. Good shit.

hopefully it is an actual match and not just Brock tossing Dean around and no selling weapon shots.

Punk vs. Brock in their Street Fight was amazing and it wasn't at WM. This one involves someone who's known for being crazy as fuck in a Street Fight. It's gon' be good.

That's gonna be an awesome match. This one I actually look forward to.

I'm all for it. Win or lose it would be HUGE for ambrose.

I think it should definitely be a win...

The Big Guy (AMC) wrote:

hopefully it is an actual match and not just Brock tossing Dean around and no selling weapon shots.

I don't see Ambrose hitting dirty deeds on Brock Lesnar. Although I can see him drop an elbow through a table. I'm actually 100% sure that will happen.

Why are people ok with Brock beating Dean? This should be the payoff.

Batman wrote:

Why are people ok with Brock beating Dean? This should be the payoff.

Because Brock beating Dean is more believable than Dean being Brock.

It's a street fight. It can go either way.

No matter what the stipulation

It's still more believable.

Plus, if Dean gets the win, that's saying he's better than Lesnar. Which means he's better than Taker.

Wasn't the whole point of Lesnar beating Taker to put someone else over? Some people want Brock to never ever lose.

Its a NoDq match which means Dean can use whatever he wants to beat the fuck out of Lesnar with.

Dean should win, Lesnar should eat the pin at WM...it won't hurt Lesnar and it builds Ambrose up

like I said though, some people want Brock to retire having never lost clean.

and those people are stupid

If you're implying that I want Brock to never lose clean... lol.

Dean Ambrose is overrated. He shouldn't beat Brock

the only defense people ever had for Lesnar beating Taker was for Lesnar to put over the next Generation since Taker is on his last legs. Because beating the guy who ended Taker's streak will make anyone look good. Not saying Lesnar should start jobbing...but he shouldn't be too much of a monster to the point where anyone beating him is unbelievable.

People wanna talk about Super Cena...well Lesnar has become Suplex Cena...which is more of a insult to Cena.

So who should beat Brock? Super Roman?

You might find Dean overrated, but Dean is the best chance they have at a "face of the company."

Roman, Dean, Slater...no matter who Lesnar needs to put someone over this Wm