HomeHomeCalendarSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in
Share | 
 

 Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2  Next
Dead
Bullet Club
Bullet Club
avatar

Posts : 14166
Join date : 2013-07-19

PostSubject: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:40 pm

Without killing Seth Rollins' momentum completely, i feel like they should put the title on him for at least a month so the record books can say Sting won a WWE Championship and have it add to his already HOF career. When the rematch comes around you can easily have Rollins win it back and continue on his roll until Wrestlemania. Thoughts?
Back to top Go down
Rellim
TeamMoose
TeamMoose
avatar

Posts : 1470
Join date : 2013-07-22
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:03 pm

No, I don't like transitional world champions at all. I wouldn't mind them doing this with a mid-card title like Intercontinental or United States championship like they did with Hart. But keep him away from the WWE title.
Back to top Go down
Myke
Main Eventer
avatar

Posts : 4544
Join date : 2013-08-18
Age : 24

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:23 pm

Fuck no. What kinda bullshit is that Bruh......

People bitched about Brock Lesnar being a part timer when he had it. It'd be the same thing, except WORSE with Sting because Lesnar looks far more in shape and isn't as old.
Back to top Go down
TJ Ω
#TeamRomie
avatar

Posts : 4964
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 23
Location : Where I Shouldn't Be

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:00 pm

Sting's gonna win it for 5 minutes and Sheamus is gonna cash in MitB I aint bothered
Back to top Go down
Online
Eeyen
Yes
Yes
avatar

Posts : 13700
Join date : 2013-07-19
Age : 24

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:04 pm

If he wins it'll just be to get Sheamus over as a heel. I am OK with it but Sheamus is never going to be a top guy. He'll be a top guy in WWE's imagination, maybe, but he'll never even get to the ADR level of overness which was not as good as they wanted in the first place.

____________________

Back to top Go down
Gobba-Gulak
TeamSmurf
TeamSmurf
avatar

Posts : 6579
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 26

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:32 pm

I wouldn't mind seeing it. And yes I bitched about Brock...but I hate Brock and I like Sting.

____________________
Back to top Go down
Zanon
Main Eventer
avatar

Posts : 1846
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 27

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 2:18 am

If anything they should give him a US Title reign cuz he was known for having that title as well (and putting on some pretty damn good matches while having it.)

World Heavyweight Title? Maybe. I can see them allowing him to win over Seth Rollins at some PPV, then have some "revenge" by Authority members, beating him down, then Sheamus cashing in for the WHT only, winning it, and having Sting keeping the US title only.

Though I would honestly prefer to have Rollins as champion until Wrestlemania OR until WWE decides to do something half-decent with Sheamus.
Back to top Go down
Giggity Gopher
Love Bites
Love Bites
avatar

Posts : 8474
Join date : 2013-07-19
Age : 25
Location : Arlington, Texas

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:43 am

No.
Back to top Go down
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsmVNcqWmf-E73tdf3cUCVg Online
Chilly
TeamSexy
TeamSexy
avatar

Posts : 12091
Join date : 2013-08-10
Age : 30
Location : Shadow Moses Island

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 5:56 am

I'm a giant Sting mark...but I certainly wouldn't put the title on him for WWE just have him go away with it for months, or even as a transitional thing to get Sheamus as Champion. I imagine they will do it at some point, just to say he held the title, but I don't think it'll be now.

There should only ever be one transitional, paper champion, and that is Mick Foley OH HAVE MERCY!!!
Back to top Go down
#BREEZANGO
Team Rusev
Team Rusev
avatar

Posts : 2161
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 22

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:29 am

Do I think Sting should win the WWE World Heavyweight Championship? Yes, why not.

Do I want him to beat someone who's actually made the belt mean something( which the belt hasn't since Daniel Bryan gave it up last year.)? Nope.

Back to top Go down
Batman
I am Batman
I am Batman
avatar

Posts : 18997
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 22
Location : Learning maturity

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:20 pm

No.
Back to top Go down
Eeyen
Yes
Yes
avatar

Posts : 13700
Join date : 2013-07-19
Age : 24

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:45 pm

Well I don't think they should, but I'm starting to think they will.

____________________

Back to top Go down
Mr. Smurf
Icon
avatar

Posts : 15242
Join date : 2013-07-23
Location : Smurfville

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:52 pm

No way. Even worse if they have him lose it right away to Sheamus. I'd prefer they give it to Sting for a month and then have him lose it back to Rollins. Although I also wouldn't be a fan of this, but I'd even rather see Authority turn on Seth Rollins and Sheamus have Sheamus cash in on Seth. (in 2-3 months or after WrestleMania, not at Night of Champions)

However, I'd prefer Seth Rollins to stay heel for a long time.

____________________
Back to top Go down
http://www.wrestling-united.com Online
Nearphotison
Middle Carder
avatar

Posts : 887
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 29

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:54 pm

I thought they might put it on him at some point, then give him a big face vs. face story with Cena leading up to WrestleMania, ending with Cena getting his sixteenth title off Sting. Flair comes to the ring, all three hug and he raises both guys hands then Sting retires because WWE will never, ever book Sting vs. 'Taker.
Back to top Go down
Eeyen
Yes
Yes
avatar

Posts : 13700
Join date : 2013-07-19
Age : 24

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:01 pm

I really want to believe that Seth Rollins will be the one to turn babyface but part of me believes Triple H will turn babyface and bury Seth. That kind of is his thing.

____________________

Back to top Go down
Batman
I am Batman
I am Batman
avatar

Posts : 18997
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 22
Location : Learning maturity

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:03 pm

Triple H should totally do that. Have Seth Rollins win every single title in WWE right now, ALL OF THEM, and then turn face, beat him in a few mins, and win every title off him
Back to top Go down
Chilly
TeamSexy
TeamSexy
avatar

Posts : 12091
Join date : 2013-08-10
Age : 30
Location : Shadow Moses Island

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:58 am

Back to top Go down
fuse
Middle Carder
avatar

Posts : 681
Join date : 2013-08-21
Age : 36
Location : London, England

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:29 am

Sting shouldn't hold a title, especially not a world championship one.
I love sting as much as the next guy, but his time on top is done.
Back to top Go down
Dead
Bullet Club
Bullet Club
avatar

Posts : 14166
Join date : 2013-07-19

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:54 pm

Some of you are thinking i meant Sting getting the belt and then disappearing with it for months. He wins at NOC and then loses it either the next night or at Hell in a Cell.
Back to top Go down
Chilly
TeamSexy
TeamSexy
avatar

Posts : 12091
Join date : 2013-08-10
Age : 30
Location : Shadow Moses Island

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Thu Sep 03, 2015 3:25 pm

If he's going to hold it for 24 hours, don't bother.
Back to top Go down
Mr. Smurf
Icon
avatar

Posts : 15242
Join date : 2013-07-23
Location : Smurfville

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Thu Sep 03, 2015 4:27 pm

If it's a 1 or even 2 month reign then sure but I'd still prefer Seth to hold on to the title. If it's a few mins or 24 hours I think that's just pointless & bad booking. And definitely wouldn't want to see him have the title until like Royal Rumble or something.

____________________
Back to top Go down
http://www.wrestling-united.com Online
Headhunter
Jobber
avatar

Posts : 8
Join date : 2015-09-06

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:13 pm

Love it or hate it, all signs are pointing to Sting beating Rollins for the belt and then have Sheamus cash in and beat Sting @ NOC:

1. The promo between Rollins and Sheamus.

2. Having Rollins lose to the guy who Triple H beat at WM would be the perfect time to make the inevitable breakup with the Authority happen.

3. Sting could salvage losing his debut match with the company and add the WWE WHC to his accolades without actually carrying the belt.

4. The mind games Sting's playing with Rollins. Adds a whole new dynamic we've never seen before with his past feuds.

5. Sting could start a program with Sheamus next (after cashing in his rematch clause), allowing him to put a younger guy over.

6. Rollins already being beat up from his match with Cena would also add reasonable ground for him to lose.

So I can definitely see cause for it.


Last edited by Headhunter on Mon Sep 07, 2015 11:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
TJ Ω
#TeamRomie
avatar

Posts : 4964
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 23
Location : Where I Shouldn't Be

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:49 pm

@Headhunter wrote:
3. Sting could salvage losing his debut match with the company and add the WWE WHC to his accolades without actually carrying the belt. He'd be the first guy in pro wrestling history to hold the TNA, WCW and WWE WHC.

Back to top Go down
Online
Headhunter
Jobber
avatar

Posts : 8
Join date : 2015-09-06

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Mon Sep 07, 2015 10:56 pm

TJtheShizz wrote:
@Headhunter wrote:
3. Sting could salvage losing his debut match with the company and add the WWE WHC to his accolades without actually carrying the belt. He'd be the first guy in pro wrestling history to hold the TNA, WCW and WWE WHC.


Oh yeah, forgot about Kurt. :lol:

Still, it would add to his accolades. He can say he held the title when he finally agreed to come over to WWE.
Back to top Go down
Chilly
TeamSexy
TeamSexy
avatar

Posts : 12091
Join date : 2013-08-10
Age : 30
Location : Shadow Moses Island

PostSubject: Re: Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?   Tue Sep 08, 2015 4:12 am

Well, you could argue he'd be the first legitimate guy to do it. Kurt was WCW Champion when WWE bought it out, so it's debatable.
Back to top Go down
 

Should WWE give Sting a short title reign?

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 2Go to page : 1, 2  Next

 Similar topics

-
» Bill C-58 "Support for Veterans and Their Families Act" (short title)
» SASK-L-I/MG Brass shoulder title wanted
» Give us a Clue Dave Edgar
» 303 Short Lee Enfield Bush gun
» Milk to Give Away-Central IL-

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Wrestle Fanatics :: The Squared Circle :: Pro Wrestling Universe + Wrestling Media-