We want member feedback. The Rising Star Division belt will be disappearing, so now we'll need a new lower tier belt. The candidates are the following:

XWA LionHeart Championship - Contrary to popular belief, the LionHeart Championship isn't JUST a "2WWF thing". It's simply a belt that the champion defends in every singles/multi-man match (excluding tag team of course). Other feds have had to have done this type of thing.

Hardcore/UltraViolent Championship - Does this need a description?

Pure Championship - Does this need a description as well?

LionHeart & Hardcore/UltraViolent Hybrid - Since this is supposed to be "XTREME" why not have a championship that is a hardcore variant? It'll be like the LionHeart where in every match it'll be defended. However, the only twist, is that every match will be a "No-DQ" or "Extreme Rules" match. This way it adds a little variety.

An Internet Championship - Members vote on stipulations. Think of Cyber Sunday. If the champion doesn't have a feud going, members vote on an opponent or even opponents. Members can also vote on stipulations for the match. Sometimes both will be needed.

NOTE: THIS DOES NOT MEAN THE BELT WITH THE MOST VOTES WILL BE CHOSEN. WE SIMPLY WANT FEEDBACK. /caps

See, I told you fuckers.

The idea of the Hardcore Lionheart is bittersweet. On one hand, it's a good concept, but someone defending the title every match would have to go all out. One can only think of so many spots. Outo f all of those, I'd like to see the Hardcore one the most.

You know what Dante? I see why nobody likes you now. I didn't have a problem with you until now. You're an annoying twat.

It was agreed upon as a whole, even by Ian.

so the RSD title is getting vacated? damm I Can't ever hold anything.

Nigga, you got the WHC. Quitcherbitchin'. >=(

Anyway, I like the idea of a LionHeart/Television Championship the most. I've seen how it can push fedders into whole new levels.

Myke wrote:

You know what Dante? I see why nobody likes you now. I didn't have a problem with you until now. You're an annoying twat.

It was agreed upon as a whole, even by Ian.

Woop di doo

I can have a sense of humor. Don't get so butthurt over what I say as if it's somehow different from what anyone else says.

But seeing as none of you fucks cared to say anything about my match even after I repeatedly asked "Hey guys could you give my match a look over", "Could someone write feedback". But no. I write a great match that gets no showed and not a thing is said about.

So yes, woop di doo.

Giggity Gopher wrote:

Nigga, you got the WHC. Quitcherbitchin'. >=(

Anyway, I like the idea of a LionHeart/Television Championship the most. I've seen how it can push fedders into whole new levels.

cause I want to hold two titles. This isn't fair I should have the right to vacate the title  and not get it stripped off of me  

You'll be in line to get a shot at whatever Championship we decide to bring in to replace this one.

Internet Championship.

I like the idea of that more, and I think it'd be something unique.

Giggity Gopher wrote:

You'll be in line to get a shot at whatever Championship we decide to bring in to replace this one.

Want me to vacate the RSD title, in this promo?

I also like the Internet Championship

Kirsten Katastrophe wrote:

Myke wrote:

You know what Dante? I see why nobody likes you now. I didn't have a problem with you until now. You're an annoying twat.

It was agreed upon as a whole, even by Ian.

Woop di doo

I can have a sense of humor. Don't get so butthurt over what I say as if it's somehow different from what anyone else says.

But seeing as none of you fucks cared to say anything about my match even after I repeatedly asked "Hey guys could you give my match a look over", "Could someone write feedback". But no. I write a great match that gets no showed and not a thing is said about.

So yes, woop di doo.

Ah, yes. The egotistical no-lifer who has nothing better to do than write mini-novels about two men touching each other has a sense of humor. Ah, yes.

Also, you didn't ask me to read it. Had you did, I would have. I know how it feels to write and write and just have the person no-show, leading to no commentary about it. So I would have. But you're too self-absorbed for me to care now.

Interesting choices.

10SD wrote:

Interesting choices.

An even more interesting choice of which you like the most, or none at all.

The plot thickens.

Dante don't bitch about no feedback when asking for it. That has happened to just about everyone here

ilikewwe11 wrote:

Giggity Gopher wrote:

You'll be in line to get a shot at whatever Championship we decide to bring in to replace this one.

Want me to vacate the RSD title, in this promo?

You can do whatever you want to the RSD Championship. It'll be officially gone by the Vendetta after King of Xtreme.

Actually after looking it over again, I do like the concept of the Internet title best.

Myke wrote:

Ah, yes. The egotistical no-lifer who has nothing better to do than write mini-novels about two men touching each other has a sense of humor. Ah, yes.

Also, you didn't ask me to read it. Had you did, I would have. I know how it feels to write and write and just have the person no-show, leading to no commentary about it. So I would have. But you're too self-absorbed for me to care now.

Mini-novels of two men touching themselves? Are you really trying to downplay eFedding--something you yourself do--to win an argument?

That idiocy aside, you seem to have forgotten already. The very moment it was stated that you were GM, I was in the chat and said something along the lines of "As your first GM action could you grade my match?". I gave variations of this for the next five minutes that were ignored and left.

So don't say I didn't ask. The only reason I am annoyed is BECAUSE I asked. I asked all of the GMs.

Myke wrote:

10SD wrote:

Interesting choices.

An even more interesting choice of which you like the most, or none at all.

The plot thickens.

If you insist.

I like The Internet Championship. The others are good though.

Kirsten Katastrophe wrote:

Myke wrote:

Kirsten Katastrophe wrote:

Ah, yes. The egotistical no-lifer who has nothing better to do than write mini-novels about two men touching each other has a sense of humor. Ah, yes.

Also, you didn't ask me to read it. Had you did, I would have. I know how it feels to write and write and just have the person no-show, leading to no commentary about it. So I would have. But you're too self-absorbed for me to care now.

Mini-novels of two men touching themselves? Are you really trying to downplay eFedding--something you yourself do--to win an argument?

That idiocy aside, you seem to have forgotten already. The very moment it was stated that you were GM, I was in the chat and said something along the lines of "As your first GM action could you grade my match?". I gave variations of this for the next five minutes that were ignored and left.

So don't say I didn't ask. The only reason I am annoyed is BECAUSE I asked. I asked all of the GMs.

There's no winning arguments over the internet. You're daft if you think so. Also, I rarely ever pay attention to chat. All I remember is you complaining that the topic was locked and you needed it unlocked to edit it. (Which I did for you.)

So yes, you didn't ask. Asking would be actually messaging the person. I can "ask" people on chat something; who is to say that specific tab will be up, focusing on the chatbox?

Internet Champion.

Myke wrote:

There's no winning arguments over the internet. You're daft if you think so. Also, I rarely ever pay attention to chat. All I remember is you complaining that the topic was locked and you needed it unlocked to edit it. (Which I did for you.)

So yes, you didn't ask. Asking would be actually messaging the person. I can "ask" people on chat something; who is to say that specific tab will be up, focusing on the chatbox?

Stop trying to focus on a word to better your statement. Right now we are having a conversation. The purpose of this extended conversation is to each make our statements clear to the other person to justify our initial statements. In succeeding in making your final comments as inarguable as possible, you have "won" the situation. Don't try to play words with me.

You were also in the chat, actively talking at the same time I made my statements directed at you. Simply say that you ignored it and move on. This wasn't about you directly anyways.

@Leo..when I read your comment I thought to myself, "I'm not everyone". So I say it now--I don't give a damn what everyone does, I asked, I want what I asked for. It's not hard. Some simple statement or even a sentence would have sufficed at the very least. Hell, if they had said "good job" at least I'd have known they'd looked it over.

Good job

Vitalyzd wrote:

Good job

Yes, but did you really feel that way?